

Thank you for Subscribing to Agri Business Review Weekly Brief
Regenerative agriculture uses natural solutions to improve the agricultural environment instead of taking away from it.
The future lies in regenerative agriculture for decarbonizing the food chain and making agriculture adaptable to climatic shocks. For years, regenerative agriculture has evolved from being a vague idea to a viable solution that holds the key to the industry's bright future. It will not happen unless they can make it commercially viable for farmers. Farmers are crucial players in the fight against climate change. Despite the apparent benefits, it is not scaling quickly enough. Biological diversity in certain circumstances and better crop yields allow for the preservation of more natural ecosystems rather than their destruction for agriculture. This is due to a combination of rotational diversification and lower pesticide use. Regenerative agriculture utilizes nature-based solutions to enrich the agricultural environment rather than deplete it. The transition's risk and expense are the top priority that must get addressed. Climate changes contribute to reducing emissions through carbon sequestration and enhanced crop resistance to climate shocks. Soil quality prevents soil deterioration by increasing soil fertility through increased biomass production. A higher nutrient use efficiency (NUE) increases crop yield and optimizes land use efficiency, whereas an increase in water use efficiency decreases the strain on freshwater reserves. Regenerative agriculture enhances the livelihood of farmers over the long run by reducing expenses, increasing crop output and crop quality, and bolstering their resistance to market instability and extreme climate events. It also provides farmers with new green revenue sources, such as compensation for carbon sequestration in the soil, moving toward economic prosperity. It seems logical that the entire food value chain, from the farmer to the consumer, would wish to promote regenerative approaches. Regenerative agriculture is sufficiently commercially appealing for farmers in the near term. Establish standard measures for measuring environmental results, and are currently numerous disparate efforts to define and quantify ecological outcomes. The entire food business must adopt measurements that make it easier for farmers to alter their operations and reward positive adjustments. Increase farmers' income through environmental outcomes such as carbon reduction and removal. A well-functioning market helps with a credible system of payments for ecological results, on which buyers and sellers can rely to provide a new, sustainable source of income for farmers. Businesses and governments are creating ways for farmers to share the transition costs. Currently, all risks and expenses rest with the farmers. Ensuring that government policy facilitates and rewards the changeover of farmers. In reality, many government programs sustain the status quo of farming, resulting in a dysfunctional food system. The food industry must collaborate with regulators to address this issue. It is essential to develop new sourcing models to disperse transition costs. In a regenerative agriculture transition, off-takers from other sectors collaborate to accept crops from regenerative agriculture regions rather than sourcing from everywhere. The climate emergency and the food crisis have a literal solution in the soil. Farmers are custodians of the land, and as such, they must be incentivized and compensated. It is impossible to restructure systems without distributing the costs and benefits along the value chain. Stakeholders in the food value chain help to commit to achieving this by advancing key areas and enabling the widespread adoption of regenerative agriculture. Regenerative agriculture puts people's and the environment's health first. It means that in addition to growing crops for sale, every farm should help protect the environment.