By
Agri Business Review | Sunday, May 14, 2023
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Soil testing is one of the most important management practices for crop production in the new millennium. It is certain to be listed among the best management practices recommended by industry and university agronomists, consultants, and farm managers for the benefit of their farmer clients.
FREMONT, CA: One of the most crucial management techniques for crop productivity in the new millennium is soil testing. It will undoubtedly be cited as one of the top management techniques suggested by consultants, farm managers, and industry and academic agronomists for the benefit of their farmer clients. Soil testing is still used by fertiliser dealers as a planning and marketing tool as well as a management support service for their clients. Also, better management of soil resources and fertiliser resources made feasible by soil testing benefits the environment.
A thorough record-keeping system for each field, including details on previous soil tests, fertiliser and manure applications, and crop yields, together with periodic soil testing, can be used as a barometer to determine if soil fertility is rising, falling, or staying the same. Statistics on fertiliser use and crop yields suggest that poor nitrogen management may be contributing to a decline in soil fertility on many farms.
It may take a while before the effects of mining soil nutrients are seen. The P1-phosphorous (P) soil test will typically decrease by 5 to 6 pounds per acre per year (lbs/yr), and the potassium (K) soil test will decrease by about 10 to 15 lbs/yr if fewer nutrients are supplied in a corn-soybean rotation with high or very high soil tests. If this pattern persists, there will be a significant loss in crop yield potential, and it might take several years of higher fertiliser rates to get back to ideal productivity. Future production and profitability are adversely impacted by allowing soil test levels to fall.
Farmer benefits
Farmers should utilise soil testing as a management tool to make decisions about their soil fertility programmes that are supported by science. The farmer gains from a fertility management programme based on soil testing in several ways: increased yields and profitability due to the crop receiving the nutrients it needs, and improved response to other management inputs due to increased uniformity of nutrient availability across a field.
More consistent crop development makes individual plants more weed-competitive and makes other management techniques, such as cultivation and spraying, simpler. Increased market quality due to consistent plant maturity within a field, which simplifies crop harvesting and drying. Using fertiliser money on nutrients will improve profits the most. Fertiliser applications within a field can be adjusted with the use of thorough sampling and variable-rate fertiliser application.
Environmental benefits
The environment gains from enhanced soil testing because it helps guarantee that the right amounts are suggested and applied for fertiliser applications based on soil tests and realistic agricultural yield targets. Crops can potentially lose fewer nutrients through leaching or surface runoff into rivers if nutrients are used more effectively by the plants. Site-specific fertility management ensures that growers correctly assess nutrient demands and apply the appropriate remedial fertiliser. Since undernourished crops leave less plant residue to hold soil in place, withholding the fertiliser that is required to produce a high-yielding, lucrative crop may be more harmful than applying the right quantity of fertiliser. Moreover, supplying all minerals at their optimal amounts promotes crop growth and may lessen the need to actively farm some marginal land.
A management technique called soil testing aids in determining the variation in nutrient content both within and between areas on a farm. To estimate the expected yield responses to applications of fertiliser ingredients, the technique entails the chemical examination of representative samples of soil from a given field together with calibration data collected from studies on similar soils.
The process's field sample collection has the biggest room for error. Obtaining representative samples is an important step since a 1-pound sample of soil sent for lab analysis reflects material from 1 to 40 acres (and up to 80 million pounds of soil in the top 6 inches). Less than a teaspoon of the sampled soil will be used in the lab. The test findings should offer a reliable indication of the soil's nutrient content if a high-quality sample is taken. The trustworthiness of the recommendations can be strengthened by increasing the number of samples from a particular field. The relative amount of a nutrient in the soil and its availability to plants are indicated by the nutrient level found in a test sample. Without the proper set of calibration data to compare it to, the soil test result has no real relevance. The soil test ratings—low, medium, high, and so forth—reflect the correlation and calibration data's findings.
Years of scientific research into sample techniques, crop yield responses to fertiliser application, and relationships between plant nutrients and other production factors form the basis for soil testing. Scientists have established that soil testing offers the knowledge required to make wise choices regarding the quantities and composition required to reach a chosen yield objective for a particular soil-climate-management system.
It's vital to use the proper combination and rates of fertiliser ingredients to grow a crop effectively and to maximise the return on every dollar spent on fertiliser. Making the best decisions for fertiliser requirements requires using the results of soil tests in conjunction with a reasonable yield target. Nutrient deficiencies can be hard to detect without soil tests. Using soil tests can occasionally result in lower overall fertiliser costs, but even more crucially, farmers should spend their money on the nutrients that their crops most urgently require.
Farmers can determine whether their current management is stealing future productivity and revenues by conducting frequent soil tests. The greatest method currently available for figuring out the nutrient requirements for producing crops is soil testing, especially when combined with regional calibration data from university research. A key element of lucrative, effective, and environmentally acceptable sustainable farming operations is soil testing to establish a balanced fertility programme.